ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF ONLINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT MODELS AND DELIVERY MODES

Walid Salameh

doi:10.53555/eijhss.v8i3.148

Authors

Walid Salameh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v8i3.148

Abstract

This qualitative inquiry seeks to gauge the success of diverse internet-based learning platforms and modes of delivery on student results. The investigation commences with a comprehensive review of literature, considering key elements such as pedagogical layout, technology assimilation, and support services for learners that foster an increase in the caliber of digital schooling. Making use of qualitative approaches, this study amasses perspectives from both students and educators via interviews and discussion groups to comprehend their respective experiences and viewpoints pertaining to varied e-learning techniques. The results underscore strengths and weaknesses present within asynchronous, synchronous, and hybrid learning methods while emphasizing the importance of ongoing enhancement in the sphere of online education. This scholarly investigation offers critical enlightenments for academic professionals and decision-makers aiming at amplifying internet-based educational initiatives thereby guaranteeing a profound impact on each student's scholastic progression.

References

Ally, M. (2016). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed., pp. 15-44). AU Press, Athabasca University.

Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435-447.

Chen, B., & Jones, N. (2018). Exploring the impacts of a hybrid professional development program on instructors' teaching in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 48-58.

Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2021). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (3rd ed.). Athabasca University Press.

Cook, D. A. (2020). Twelve Tips for Effective Online Learning: A Primer for Medical Students. Medical Teacher, 42(11), 1204-1208.

Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2018). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What happened to the social? A literature review of social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 128-136.

Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2019). MOOCs Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention – A Literature Review. In Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 1253-1262). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. Routledge.

Moore, M. G. (2019). Handbook of Distance Education. Routledge.

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.

Thorne, K. (2016). An exploratory study of blended learning delivery modes for large enrolment courses in the Canadian community college context. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 42-50.