MATE SELECTION, SPOUSAL SUPPORT, AND MARITAL ATISFACTION IN WOMEN OF TURKISH ORIGIN LIVING IN BELGIUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v4i1.69Keywords:
Belgium, married woman, marital satisfaction, spousal supportAbstract
This research was carried out to investigate the marital satisfaction and perceived spousal support in married women of Turkish origin living in Belgium. The study was carried out with a sample of 406 married women of Turkish origin and The Marital Life Scale and The Spouse Support Scale were used in the study. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine whether or not marital satisfaction and perceived spousal support mean scores of participants differ according to the mate selection, education level, perceived income level and working status. Results indicated that women of Turkish origin living in Belgium have reported a medium level of marital satisfaction and perceived spousal support and no significant difference was found between mean marital satisfaction and perceived spousal support in women married with a spouse from Turkey and women married a spouse from the Turkish community in Belgium. In addition, it was determined that women with higher education and women with higher income level and women who are working have tended to have higher marital satisfaction and perceived spousal support
References
. Acitelli, L.K., & Antonucci, T.C. (1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 688-698.
. Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. (1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage and Family Review, 12, 133-156. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2015).
. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1992). Interventions to ease the transition to parenthood: Why they are needed, and what they can do. Family Relations, 44, 412−423.Çağ, P. (2011).
. Evli bireylerde eş desteği ve evlilik doyumu. Yükseklisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
. Çağ, P. ve Yıldırım, İ. (2013). Evlilik doyumunu yordayan ilişkisel ve kişisel değişkenler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(39), 13-23.De Singly, F. (2010).
. Sosyologie de la Famille contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin.Dehle, C., Larsen, D., & Landers, J.E. (2001). Social support in marriage. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 307-324.Helgeson, V. (1993).
. Two important distinctions in social support: Kind of support and perceived versus received. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 825-845.Giguere J., Fortin C., & Saburin S. (1999). Déterminant de satisfaction conjugale chez des personnes vivant une première ou une seconde union conjugale. Journal International De Psychologie, 34 (2), 119-132.Gilbert A.M. (2016).La satisfaction conjugale chez des parents primipares vivant en union libre lors de la transition à la parentalité.Yükseklisans tezi, l'Université du Québec.Jamoulle, P. (2010). Trouble des transmissions dans les quartiers populaires à forte densité immigrée. Bruxelles: FRBKabasakal, Z. ve Soylu, Y. (2016)
. Evli bireylerin evlilik doyumunun cinsiyet ve eş desteğine göre incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), 208-2014.Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Kaya, A., & Kentel, F. (2007).
. Belgo-Turc, Pont ou Brèche entre la Turquie et L’union européenne? Bruxelles: FRB.Manço, A. (2000). Sociographie de la population turque et d’origine turque, Quarante ans de présence en Belgique (1960-2000), Dynamiques, problèmes, perspectives. Bruxelles. Edition euopéenne S.A.Newman, B. N. (2000). The challenges of parenting infants and young children. In P. C. McKenry & S.J. Price (Eds.), Families and Change: Coping with Stressful Eventsand Transitions (pp. 186−204).
. London: sage.Rini, C., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Hobel, C. J., Glynn, L. M., & Sandman, C. A. (2006).
. Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13, 207–229.Schoonvaere, Q. (2013).
. Etude démographique de la population turque en Belgique. Bruxelles: Centre pour l’Egalité des Chances et la Lutte contre le Racisme.Sokolski, D.M., & Hendrick,S.S. (1999). Marital satisfaction. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26(1), 39-49. Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S., & Markman, H. (2004). Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25(4), 496.Stinson, M. A., Bermu ́dez, J. M., Gale, J., Lewis, D., Meyer, A. S., & Templeton, G. B. (2017).
. Marital satisfaction, conflict resolution styles, and religious attendance among latino couples: Using the Actor–partner ınterdependence model. the family journa ounseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 25(3), 215-223. Doi: 10.1177/1066480717710645Şahin, İ. (2008).
. Gӧçmen kadınların dini rituellere katılımı: Amersfoort (Hollanda) ve Boğazlıyan ӧrneğinde karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erciyes Universitesi, Kayseri.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6.Baskı).United States: Pearson Education.Taş, E. (2008). KISMET! Belgique/Turquie: Regards croisés sur mariages et migration, l’Harmattan, Paris.Taş, E. (2011). Mariage entre la clinique et le terrain : cas des Turcs,Santé mentale et Migration, Diversité et Citoyenneté, IRFAM, Liège, N°: 25, pp.18-22.Taş, E. (2014).
. Les Alliances Renversées, Souffrances des gendres dans les migrations matrimoniales turques, PAF, Saarbrücken. Taş, E. (2018). Türkiye’den Belçika’ya damat göçü ve psikolojik etkileri. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 341-352.Taş, E., & Subaşı, Z. (2017).
. A view of family structures of Turkish immigrant community in Belgium under the light of clinical studies.Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1)1, 43-64.Teule, J., Vanderwaeren, E., & Mbah-Fongkimeh A. (2012).
. La migration par le mariage d’Emirdağ à Bruxelle. Université d’Anvers. Bruxelles: FRB. Tezer, E. (1996). Evlilik ilişkisinden sağlanan doyum: Evlilik Yaşam Ölçeği. TürkPsikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 7 (2), 1-7. Torrekens, C., & Adam, İ. (2015).
. Belgo-Marocains, Belgo-Turcs: (Oto) Portrait de nos citoyens. Bruxelles: Edition de FRB.Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K.,, & Foster, C. A. (2003).
. Parenthood and Marital Satisfaction: A Meta‐Analytic Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 574-583.Uluç, M. (2018). Evli bireylerde eş uyumunun ve algılananeş desteğinin eş tükenmişliğine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yükseklisans tezi. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kıbrıs.Vural-Batık, M. ve Kalkan, M. (2016).
. Evli bireylerin algıladıkları eş desteği ve evlilik doyumu. VI. Uluslararası Canik Sempozyumu, 5-7 Mayıs, Samsun. Vural-Batık, M. & Kalkan, M. (2017).
. Evlilikte Algılanan Sorun Çözme Becerileri ve Evlilik Doyumu. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 6(5), 2630-2646Yedirir, S., & Hamarta, E. (2015).
. Emotional expression and spousal support as p redictors of marital satisfaction: The case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1549-1558. Doi: 10.12738/estp.2015.6.2822 Yıldırım, İ. (2004).
. Eş destek ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(22), 19-25.Yıldız, Ö.Z. (2018).
. Evlilik doyumunun öncülleri ve sonuçları: Depresyon, kaygı, erken dönem uyumsuz şemalar.Yayınlanmamış yükseklisans tezi. Işık Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.Yıldız, M.A., & Baytemir, K. (2016).
. Evli bireylerde evlilik doyumu ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkide benlik saygısının aracılığı. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 67-80. Doi: 10.17679/iuefd.1718162
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (ISSN: 2208-2174)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
