UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE AND THE CHALLENGE OF CULTURAL PLURALISM

Authors

  • Anik Chakladar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v10i1.251

Abstract

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC), enshrined in Article 44 of the Indian Constitution as a Directive Principle of State Policy, envisions the creation of a common set of personal laws governing all citizens, irrespective of religion. While this objective reflects the constitutional ideals of equality, secularism, and national integration, it also raises fundamental questions about India’s deep-rooted cultural and religious diversity protected under Articles 25 to 28. This paper critically examines the constitutional mandate for a UCC and its complex relationship with the right to freedom of religion. It explores how judicial pronouncements, from Shah Bano to Sarla Mudgal, have reignited the debate on balancing secular legal reform with the pluralistic fabric of Indian society. The paper also analyzes the divergent views of successive Law Commission reports and evaluates the political and social implications of implementing a UCC in a multi-religious, multicultural democracy. By engaging with comparative legal frameworks and indigenous reform movements, the study investigates whether legal uniformity necessarily entails cultural homogenization or whether a harmonized approach can respect diversity while promoting constitutional morality. The paper concludes that any move toward a Uniform Civil Code must be grounded in democratic deliberation, inclusive dialogue, and respect for India’s pluralistic ethos, ensuring that reform does not become a tool for majoritarian imposition but rather a means of social justice for all.

Author Biography

  • Anik Chakladar

    Assistant Professor Durgapur Institute Of Legal Studies, , West Bengal

References

• Ahmed, A. S. (2013). The Indian Islamic personal law and gender justice. Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(1), 91–110.

• Ballard, R. (2011). Religious arbitration and Sharia councils in the UK. Religion, State & Society, 39(1), 85–105.

• Basu, D. D. (2015). Introduction to the constitution of India (21st ed.). LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa.

• Bhargava, R. (2010). Secularism and its critics. Oxford University Press.

• Charrad, M. M. (2001). States and women's rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. University of California Press.

• Government of India. (1950). Constitution of India. https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/constitution-india

• Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice. (2018). Consultation paper on uniform civil code. https://lawmin.gov.in

• Law Commission of India. (1955). Report No. 21: Reform of Hindu personal laws.

• Law Commission of India. (2018). Report No. 267: Consultation paper on uniform civil code.

• Nussbaum, M. C. (2008). The clash within: Democracy, religious violence, and India's future. Harvard University Press.

• Pal, M. (2014). Personal laws and uniform civil code in India: Constitutional and societal challenges. Indian Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), 22–39.

• Shah Bano Case (Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum), AIR 1985 SC 945 (India Supreme Court, 1985).

• Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 1531 (India Supreme Court, 1995).

• John Vallamattom v. Union of India, (2003) 6 SCC 611 (India Supreme Court, 2003).

• Zürcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A modern history. I.B. Tauris.

• Bell, J. (2008). French legal system. Oxford University Press.

• Butt, S. (2010). Sharia and national law in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 5(1), 1–22.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-18