ASYMMETRIC FEDERALISM IN THE NORTHEAST AND THE DEMOCRATIC STRUGGLE FOR SIXTH SCHEDULE IN MANIPUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/tz4nsr52Keywords:
Asymmetric federalism, democratic struggle, sixth schedule, Manipur, constitutional arrangementsAbstract
The paper examines the unique constitutional arrangements granted to some states in the Northeast with reference to sixth schedule. It explores the democratic struggle of the tribals for the implementation of sixth schedule in Manipur, as they have been left out of the scheme unlike their counterparts in other states of the Northeast. The paper aims to contribute to deeper understanding of asymmetric federalism in India and the quest for democratic empowerment among the tribals in Manipur.
References
1. Bhatia, Bela. (2010). “Justice Denied to Tribals in the Hill Districts of Manipur,” Economic & Political Weekly, Vol 45, No 31, pp 38–46.
2. Burgess, Michael. (2006). “Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice” (London: Routledge).
3. Chaube, S.K. (2012). “Hill Politics in Northeast India,” (3rd ed), Hyderabad: Orient Black Swan.
4. Haokip, Thongkholal. (2022). “Unwillingness to share power: Manipur and the ADCs Bill, 2021,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol LVII no 14, 2nd April, 2022.
5. Hausing, Kham Khan Suan. (2015). “From Opposition to Acquiescence: The 2015 District Council Elections in Manipur,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.50(46 & 47), 79-83.
6. Hausing, Kham Khan Suan. (2021). “In Manipur, a case for asymmetric federalism,” The Hindu, Op-ed section, 21st September.
7. Keil, Soeren and Paul Anderson. (2018). “Decentralization as a Tool for Conflict Resolution,” Handbook of Territorial Politics, Klaus Detterbeck and Eve Hepburn (eds), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 89–104.
8. Kom, S. (2010). “Identity and governance : demand for Sixth Schedule in Manipur.” The Indian Journal of Political Science, 71(1), 313-322.
9. Lijphart, Arend. (1969). “Consociational Democracy,” World Politics, Vol 21, No 2,pp 207–25.
10. McGarry, John. (2005). “Asymmetric Federalism and the Plurinational State” Position paper for The 3rd International Conference on Federalism, Brussels, 3-5 March 2005.
11. Ngaihte, Thangkhanlal. (2022). “The Working of Autonomous District Council in Manipur in theory and practice.” A chapter on ‘Autonomy and Democratic governance in Northeast India’ Taylor and Francis publication.
12. Piang, L.Lam Khan. (2019). “Institutional Exclusion of the Hill Tribes in Manipur: Demand for Protection under the Sixth Schedule” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.54 (15), pp.54-61.
13. Rao, M. Govinda and Nirvikar Singh. (2000). “Asymmetric Federalism in India.”
14. Riker, William. (1975). “Federalism,” in Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 5, FredI. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Saxena, Rekha. (2012). “Is India a case of Asymmetric Federalism ?” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.47 Issue No.02, 14 Jan,2012.
16. Stepan, Alfred. (1999).“Federalism and Democracy: beyond the US model” Journal of Democracy, Vol 10, No 4,p 31.
17. Watts, Ronald L. (2008). “Comparing Federal Systems” (Montreal and Kingston: Institute of Intergovermental realtions ), 3rd edition.
