Review Guidelines

Quality Assurance & Integrity Framework Peer Review Policy

The EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IJHSS) is profoundly grateful for the dedication and expertise provided by our global network of reviewers. Peer review is an essential service that maintains the quality of the scholarly record. To ensure every manuscript is judged solely on its academic contribution, we employ a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review System.

The Double-Blind Advantage

By ensuring the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, we eliminate potential biases associated with gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation. This ensures the focus remains exclusively on the methodology, theoretical framework, and social significance of the research.

01
Preliminary Review

Initial screening verifies scope relevance and ethical compliance for originality.

02
Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers scrutinize methodological rigor and the potential to advance knowledge.

03
Ethical Safeguards

Reviewers are bound by strict confidentiality and guard against duplicate submission.

Final Publication Authority

While peer reviewers provide vital expertise, the final decision rests exclusively with the Editor-in-Chief. This ensures a consistent standard of excellence and adherence to international scholarly regulations.

Quality Benchmarks

  • • Theoretical depth and social impact.
  • • Structural clarity and linguistic precision.
  • • Adherence to COPE ethical guidelines.

Editorial Outcomes

Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject

Official Inquiry: editor@ijhss.com