Review Guidelines

The Double-Blind Framework

The journal utilizes a Double-Blind Peer Review model to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly record. By maintaining total anonymity for both authors and reviewers, we eliminate potential biases related to institutional prestige, gender, or seniority. This ensures that every manuscript is evaluated strictly on the quality of its research and the strength of its arguments.

01
Anonymization

All metadata and author identifiers are stripped from the file prior to review.

02
Expert Analysis

At least two independent experts conduct an impartial evaluation.

03
Final Verdict

Editors synthesize reports to reach a fair and final publication decision.

Ethical Mandates

  • • Confidentiality: Manuscripts are treated as privileged documents.
  • • Objectivity: Personal or professional bias must be disclosed or avoided.
  • • Compliance: Concerns regarding plagiarism must be reported to the Editor.

Review Metrics

  • • Methodological rigor and analytical depth.
  • • Novelty and contribution to the subject area.
  • • Structural clarity and precision of language.

Formal Recommendations

Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject