LAND AND FOREST RIGHTS IN NORTH EAST INDIA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TRIPURA

Authors

  • Dr. Sasanka Ghosh Associate Professor in Political Science, Government Degree College, Panisagar, North Tripura, Tripura.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/nj2bpb58

Keywords:

North East India, Tripura, Common Property Resource (CPR), Symbiotic Relationship, Rights of the Tribal People, Neo Liberal State

Abstract

Traditional tribal societies of North East India were symbiotically related to the nature. Indigenous ethnic groups, living in this region of India since the pre-historic period were traditionally dependent upon forest resources. Land was livelihood and common forest was the source of food and sustenance for them. Intervention of modern State could not preserve this symbiotic relationship between the human society and nature, rather the State is held responsible for the destruction of such system. State-induced process of modernization led large scale destruction of forest. The modern land right regime based upon individual entitlement upon land and other natural resources ruined the traditional ethnic life-world of the ethnic communities. Development projects required land and therefore the State occupied common land without proper rehabilitation for the displaced people. In the case of Tripura also, the administration whosoever controls it hardly cares for the tribal people and their life-world. Outsiders have been encouraged to settle down permanently in Tripura for the sake of generating higher revenues. As a result, the indigenous people gradually lost their control upon land and natural resources. In this context, this paper argues that statist interventions upon natural resources are/were responsible for the impoverishment of the indigenous people in North East Region in general and Tripura in particular.

References

1.Basu, Pradip Kumar (1996) The Communist Movement in Tripura Kolkata Progressive Publishers.

2.Barpujari, H. K. (1996) Assam in the Days of the Company 1826-1858. Shillong: North Eastern Hill University

3.Behara Dipak Kumar & Georg Pfeffer (2008): Identity, Intervention and Ideology in Tribal India & Beyond Concept Publication, New Delhi.

4.Bhaumik Subir (2003): Insurgent Crossfire North East India. Lancer, New Delhi.

5.Bhaumik Subir (2009): Troubled Periphery–Crisis of India’s North East Sage Publications, New Delhi.

6.Bhaumik Subir (2012): Tripura: Ethnic Conflicts, Militancy & Counterinsurgency www.mcrg.ac.in /pp52.pdf‎

7.Bhattacharjee Pravas Ranjan (1993): Economic Transition in Tripura Vikas Publishing House PVT. LTD. Kolkata.

8.Bhattacharyya Banikantha (1986): Tripura Administration – The Era of Modernisation Mittal Publications, New Delhi.

9.Bhattacharyya, Gayatri (1988) Refugee Rehabilitation andits Impacton Tripura’s EconomyOmsons Publications, Guwahati.

10.Bhattacharyya, Suchintya (1991): Genesis of Tribal Extremism in Tripura Gian Publishing House. New Delhi.

11.Chakraborty Dipannita (2004): Land Question in Tripura Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi.

12.D’Souza, Alphonsus. 2001. Traditional Systems of Forest Conservation in North East India: The Angami Tribe of Nagaland. Guwahati; North Eastern Social Research Centre

13.Fernandes, Walter. (1993): “Forests and Tribals: Informal Economy, Dependence and Management Traditions” in “Continuity and Change in Tribal Society” (ed) Mrinal Miri, Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, Shimla.

14.Fernandes, Walter. 1995. "Environmental Deterioration and Sustainable Development," The Administrator, 40 (n. 2, April-June), pp. 20-48.

15.Vohra, B.L. (2011):Tripura’s Brave hearts –A Police Success Story of Counter- Insurgency Konark Publishers New Delhi.

16.Xaxa Virginius (2014): “State, Society and Tribes- Issues in Post-Colonial India” Pearson, Noida

Downloads

Published

2024-01-18