A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF INDIAN MUSICAL AESTHETICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/zjbqka18Keywords:
Indian Musical Aesthetics, Nada, Rasa, Natyashastra, Hindustani, CarnaticAbstract
Indian classical music is not only an art, but also a philosophy and an aesthetic practice. This article reviews the foundations of Indian musical aesthetics through various layers of Indian classical theories. It also focuses on regional musical traditions and recent scholarly interpretations. Rasa is the principal element of Indian aesthetic theory along with Nada. They describe the way music evokes feelings and arouses emotional responses in the listener. They also characterize music as having ontological and spiritual dimensions. The early theories, particularly those of the Natyashastra, refer to music as a medium that influences mental states and provides aesthetic pleasure. The paper also discusses the two main streams of Indian classical music, going beyond traditional theory to provide a comparative analysis of Hindustani and Carnatic music and assess the independent aesthetic attributes of each. It is useful for understanding the different ways in which common concepts are constructed in different cultural and historical contexts. The traditions share a similar philosophical lineage, but there are significant differences in their performance, aesthetic emphases, structures, and styles. In addition to this traditional and comparative approach, this paper surveys recent writings in the scholarly arena that approach Indian musical aesthetics from a contemporary standpoint. Scholars today study Indian music in an interdisciplinary way, linking classical theory with the present cultural, intellectual, and technological fabric of life. This paper brings together all these viewpoints to provide a comprehensive review of Indian musical aesthetics as perceived, constructed, and re-framed in the 21st century.
Downloads
References
1. Bharata Muni. (1957). The Natyashastra: A treatise on ancient Indian dramaturgy and histrionics (Manomohan Ghosh, Trans.). Manisha Granthalaya.
2.Krishna, T. M. (2013). A southern music: The Karnatik story. HarperCollins India.
3.Mani, R. (2002). Beyond retribution: Seeking justice in the shadows of war. Polity Press.
4.Manuel, P. (1988). Popular musics of the non-Western world. Oxford University Press.
5.Munshi, B. (2025). The aesthetic perception of Indian classical music: A comparative review. Journal of Musicology and Arts.
6.Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford University Press.
7.Rowell, L. (1992). Music and musical thought in early India. University of Chicago Press.
8.Subramanian, L. (2017). The reinvention of Indian classical music: Music and modernity in South India. Oxford University Press.
9.Tagore, R. (1917). Personality. Macmillan.
10.Timalsina, S. (2008). Consciousness in Indian philosophy: The Advaita doctrine of awareness only. Routledge.
11.Vajpeyi, A. (2012). Righteous republic: The political foundations of modern India. Harvard University Press.
12.Viswanathan, T., & Allen, M. H. (2004). Music in South India: The Karnatak concert tradition and beyond. Oxford University Press.
13.Wade, B. C. (2009). Music in India: The classical traditions. Manohar.
14.Weidman, A. J. (2006). Singing the classical, voicing the modern: The postcolonial politics of music in South India. Duke University Press.
15.Worldbeat. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldbeat. Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dipanwita Mandal, Dr. Priyadarshi Patnaik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


