DIGITAL INEQUALITY, SOCIAL INCLUSION, AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY

Michael T. Ardizone

doi:10.69980/yv691g66

Authors

Michael T. Ardizone Department of Education, Sta. Catalina Integrated National High School, Majayjay, Laguna 4005 Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/yv691g66

Abstract

The use of digital technologies has become the medium of access to instruction, learning materials and institutional communication but the assumption of connectivity as a means of educational inclusion is challenged. This is a critical and integrative review that explores the role of digital inequality in the social inclusion and education opportunity in today's societies. The review employed a transparent, non-systematic design with a combination of keyword searching web-based scholarly records, backward citation tracing and explicit relevance and credibility criteria. Selected peer-reviewed studies were thematically compared in terms of structural drivers, digital skills/digital meaningful use, intersecting disadvantages, educational participation, and policy response. The synthesis shows that inequalities in devices, connectivity quality and skills are always related to socioeconomic status, geography, gender and disability, while physical access alone has had mixed impacts on education. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies demonstrate that pedagogical and household support is necessary in order to achieve a strong or mixed effect. The review suggests a conversion framework which involves structural conditions, access to material, skills and meaningful use, and institutional support in determining whether digital resources can be an educational opportunity and therefore social inclusion. The framework is a conceptual synthesis and is not an empirically tested causal model. Policy implications point towards coordinated, multi-layered approaches that integrate the following: affordable connectivity, devices, skills development, accessible design, and teacher preparation and are measured with opportunity-oriented indicators. The evidence is hindered by cross-sectional design, lack of uniformity across geographic areas, and lack of uniformity across measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Assefa, Y., Gebremeskel, M. M., Moges, B. T., Tilwani, S. A., & Azmera, Y. A. (2025). Rethinking the digital divide and associated educational in(equity) in higher education in the context of developing countries: The social justice perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2024-0058

2. Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

3. Camerini, A.-L., Schulz, P. J., & Jeannet, A.-M. (2018). The social inequalities of Internet access, its use, and the impact on children's academic performance: Evidence from a longitudinal study in Switzerland. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2489–2508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817725918

4. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

5. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/

6. Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in Internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751298

7. Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), Article e2022376118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118

8. Escueta, M., Nickow, A. J., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). Upgrading education with technology: Insights from experimental research. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(4), 897–996. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191507

9. Fairlie, R. W., & Robinson, J. (2013). Experimental evidence on the effects of home computers on academic achievement among schoolchildren. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.3.211

10. Gonzales, A. L. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1050438

11. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

12. Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a "digital underclass" in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676

13. Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women's Studies International Forum, 34(6), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001

14. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Stoilova, M. (2023). The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people's lives and wellbeing: A systematic evidence review. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1176–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189

15. Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, Article 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

16. Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2011). Home computer use and the development of human capital. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 987–1027. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr008

17. Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A.-L., & Ledesma, A. G. L. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291

18. Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006

19. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring digital capital: An empirical investigation. New Media & Society, 22(5), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604

20. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266

21. Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

22. Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001

23. Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

24. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

25. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

26. Van Lancker, W., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e243–e244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0

27. Vigdor, J. L., Ladd, H. F., & Martinez, E. (2014). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Economic Inquiry, 52(3), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12089

28. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791

29. Zheng, Y., & Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of what? Social exclusion in the e-society as capability deprivation. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840810896018